
I was at a bar the other day with some friends, and it was $1 for three songs. A good price, and a short enough set so everyone gets a turn. My two buddies each pick three songs, and we start drinking. A few minutes later, I go up, put in my dollar and pick out my songs. I come back, finish my drink, and await my first choice. My buddy’s last song finishes and then…and then…
Not my song. Instead, some terrible, pansy-ass emo song. Okay, I think, maybe somebody slipped in between me and my friend. No big deal. I’ll just wait it out.
One song goes by. Then two. Then three. Four…five…six…all godawful, I-still-pee-my-pants indie rock. By now it’s pretty clear that this guy must have used the $5-for-15 deal. Which I suppose isn’t much of a deal at all, really.
Song 15 comes and goes, and STILL, no songs of mine. WTF! By this time we’re ready to leave, and I exit the bar, one dollar short and nothing to show for it.
So please, obey the 3-song rule. Toot it and boot it, okay? Don’t stay the night. Nobody gives a shit about your musical taste and how awesome it is. Your job as bar DJ is to get people excited and energized, you see, because these good people just want to get laid. Dashboard Confessional doesn’t exactly rev the engines, you know?
“Your haaaaaaaaair is eeeeeeverywhere!!!”
GAG.

This is what happens when you let the fringe become the center.
The recent shooting of Gabrielle Giffords (along with 19 other people), has sent shudders across America and its political landscape. In what can only be described as a rampage, Jared Loughner, a 22 year-old, first shot Giffords in the back of the head at point blank range before proceeding to open fire on the crowd gathered around her. He would eventually be subdued by bystanders and now awaits his fate.
In our society, such savagery is often categorized with words like “insane” and “inhuman.” Linguistically, it offers us the ability to unlink ourselves from the individual, comforting us, since we ourselves are, of course, merely sane and human.
Unfortunately, this act was both sane and human, a fact we need to face up to. Insane is not legally purchasing a gun, writing a confession letter, deliberately targeting and walking up to your intended target, pulling the trigger at point blank range, and proceeding to shoot her staff and followers. Inhuman is not living, breathing, being. To portray the shooter as a lunatic space alien is imprudent and ignorant; he was very much like you and me.
But surely, then, there must be some difference between him and us, right? After all, he was the one with his finger on the trigger.
Yes, this is true. But how did that finger get there in the first place? And why?
I don’t pretend to know the whole answer. However, this much I do know: the words, images, and rhetoric used in the recent election cycle, and the debate on health care that preceded it, were some of our country’s most toxic. Emerging from this sludge was the Tea Party, a group of loosely connected individuals with a catchy name, made up of a few intelligent people upset with our current state of affairs and a few more indignant, anti-government malcontents. Those of the “Get a job, morans!” and “Keep your government hands off my Medicare” lot.
Now, it’s not as if these political fringe dwellers came from nowhere. They’ve been around as long as there’s been reason to complain, they’ve just never been given a voice.
Enter Sarah Palin. The milfy, failed VP turned demagogue, took these good people under her arm like the Grizzly Mama she is. Using the down-home, folksy nonsense that made her so popular, she pretended that she cared about them, that their opinions weren’t crazy like that liberal MSM said. That it was okay to bring a military assault rifle to an Obama speech. That if you’re upset, you can vote not just with your ballot, but with your finger.
Your trigger finger.
Yes, at the time, when Palin released her controversial map of “targeted” Democrats who voted for the health care bill, we all laughed and said, “Oh, Sarah, there you go again.”
Guess who was included in that list? Gabrielle Giffords. How funny do you think Palin’s phrase, “Don’t retreat – RELOAD!” sounds now?
Talk about loaded rhetoric; perfect ammunition for a young man violently discontent with his government, in a state (Arizona) where buying a gun is as easy as buying bread, where you can legally carry a gun into a bar and to a school.
To be fair, it’s true that that both sides of the aisle, left and right, liberal and conservative, have their share of constituents with extreme views. In fact, one issue the liberals have had recently is that they’ve managed to chase all the most left-leaning members out of their party, and as such have become a disillusioned mass, believing in a lot but caring about very little.
The real problem, though, is that the conservative party has done no such thing. Beginning four years ago, with Barack Obama’s candidacy, neo-conservatives like Palin, Limbaugh, Beck, and others, began embracing their party’s fringe. Seeing an opportunity to capture passionate voters, they began fanning the flames of “populist rhetoric,” code for “angry uprising.” And as wildfire is wont to do, it spread. This created a dangerous feedback loop, where the puppet masters became ever more controlled by their puppets. The election of so many non-traditional politicians a few months ago was merely the beginning of the right’s political gymnastics, bending the edges of their party back to center.
In a remarkably short period, the lunatics had taken over the asylum, only this time, they were handed the keys. Republicans abdicated all responsibility, choosing instead to ride their fiery bronco to electoral victory. Democrats, on the other hand, merely stood by, naively hoping that the little Tea Party mosquitoes would just find someone else to bother.
And oh, how the news media ate it up! By giving the movement such coverage, we legitimized the illegitimate. Every one loves a horse race, right, CNN? Who’s your money on now?
Yes, James Loughner did pull the trigger. No one here is making excuses for that. However, the fault isn’t solely his. We all are to blame, we all played a role. Health care, the tent pole upon which the whole debate hung, is not a battle. Politics is not a war. Not every disagreement involves one party “lashing out” or another “getting revenge.” Our language has become so sensationalized that we’ve left ourselves no room to breathe.
More tempered word choice isn’t going to bring back the dead, nor will it make up for the misdeeds of others. But by realizing that battle cries and rallying points are best left on an actual battlefield, perhaps we can take a step forward in the way we treat each other, and our country.
But what do I know? I’m just a moran.

The WLA is introducing a new post: “That Guy.” I think everyone knows That Guy.
Today’s That Guy: Guy Who Doesn’t Know When to Shut the Hell Up.
You, on the way to your desk: “Hey, That Guy, how are you?”
That Guy: “Oh, hey! How was your weekend?”
You: “Pretty good.”
TG: “Yea, awesome. I totally didn’t get enough sleep, you know. It was like, my cat kept getting me up to pee! And then I was thinking about this joke on Conan, oh my God, it was so funny. Did you see it?”
You: “No.”
TG: “Yea, it was something like, yea, I don’t remember but it was really funny. Too bad you missed it. Do you like Conan? I was thinking about that once…glorble glorble blah blah blah blah zzzzzzz…….”
You (five minutes of annoying nodding and smiling): “Alright, I’m gonna get some coffee.”
TG: “Awesome. I’ll come with you. Hey, are you on AIM? We could totally chat during work, which is like really boring, you know? Last week…”
I think you get my drift.
Hey, That Guy: Good morning to you too. NOW SHUT THE HELL UP. You’re nice enough, but Jesus, man, you are not that interesting, and neither is your cat.
.jpeg)
WLA says: HELL YES! Deadline Hollywood reports that Sam Neill, aka Dr. Alan Grant, is set to star in J.J. Abrams’ new drama, Alcatraz.
Does this mean dinosaurs in San Francisco? One can only hope!
Dr. Alan Grant: Try to imagine yourself in the Cretaceous Period. You get your first look at this “six foot turkey” as you enter a clearing. He moves like a bird, lightly, bobbing his head. And you keep still because you think that maybe his visual acuity is based on movement like T-Rex – he’ll lose you if you don’t move. But no, not Velociraptor. You stare at him, and he just stares right back. And that’s when the attack comes. Not from the front, but from the side,
[makes 'whoshing' sound]
Dr. Alan Grant: from the other two ‘raptors you didn’t even know were there. Because Velociraptor’s a pack hunter, you see, he uses coordinated attack patterns and he is out in force today. And he slashes at you with this… a six-inch retractable claw, like a razor, on the the middle toe. He doesn’t bother to bite your jugular like a lion, say… no no. He slashes at you here… or here… or maybe across the belly, spilling your intestines. The point is… you are alive when they start to eat you. So you know… try to show a little respect.

Dear Mr. President,
I’ve been supporting you since I first heard of you, back in the days when nobody had heard of you. I’ve given you money, time, and even my email address (some companies pay good money for that) because I believe in you. Even though you get a lot of undeserved crap for actually listening to both sides of an argument, I respect someone who is considerate in their decision-making process. But surely, you realize that there’s a time for compromise and a time to stand your ground.
Do you know what time it is now?
As more details of the tax-cut deal with Republican leaders leak out, I grow increasingly doubtful that you do.
Mr. President, the time is now to say “no” to Republicans and their desire to extend tax cuts for the wealthiest of Americans.
As unfortunate as it is to admit this, “no” is a surprisingly effective political strategy. Republicans have employed it to great effect the past decade. It even cost your party considerably this past election. Republicans said “no” to every reasonable plan you put forward, and look how well things turned out for them!
Americans as a whole are stupid, but we aren’t foolish. We can spot a bad deal when we see it. And this deal you’re about to cut is very, very bad. It adds trillions of dollars of spending at a time when everyone (including you) believe say we have to cut spending. But that’s not the worst part.
The worst part, Mr. President, is that you’ve capitulated to Republicans on an issue with which you could have buried them.
The tax cuts, which pretty much everyone agrees were an economically bad idea in the first place, expire for everybody at the end of this year. Now, even though it would be a big help to get us out of this mess, no one’s politically stupid enough to say we should let them expire for the majority of people who actually vote (i.e. the middle class). And that’s where you could have pinned the Republicans into a corner. Forced THEM to let the cuts expire. Who are the ones filibustering a plan to extend all middle-class tax cuts? Republicans. Who should take the blame when that doesn’t pass, and thus raises taxes on everyone? Republicans.
Make these people actually filibuster. No threats, no nonsense. Make them read the damn Joy of Cooking all night. I, for one, would love to know the recipe for Mitch McConnell’s Famous Fruit Cake. The Senate would become political theater in which the Republicans would look like petty vaudevillians shilling for their incredibly wealthy backers.
You say that “We cannot play politics at a time when the American people are looking for us to solve problems.” What problem are you solving exactly? You’re just putting it off for two more years. If that’s your definition of problem solving, you really aren’t smarter fifth grader.
Speaking of fifth graders, you have two children, do you not? It boggles me to think that somehow you raised two girls and didn’t learn how to say “no.” Perhaps Sasha and Malia were always this spitting image of perfection, but I highly doubt it. I suspect that there were times when you had to be firm, even in the face of incredible pressure. So you must know that the way to handle a petulant child isn’t to coddle them. Why do you insist, then, on coddling out-of-control politicians? Because let’s face it, the difference between children and politicians is pretty much just an age game.
You said you’d rather be a great one-term president than a mediocre two-term president. Tell you what. In the spirit of things, let me make you a deal: you can be a great president and a two-term president.
All you have to do is say “no.”

Do you? Do you even care? If this title didn’t make you look twice, why not?
I’ll be the first to admit I’m a grammar nazi/prick/know-it-all. If I weren’t me, I’d probably want to punch me in the face sometimes. Thankfully my sense of self-preservation is developed enough to prevent this from happening too often, but sometimes you just have to risk it.
Okay. Are you paying attention? “Your and you’re” are not the same, nor are they interchangeable. I know you know this. I’m the WLA. I also know that if you’re reading this, you have learned the basic skill of literacy. You have been given an incredible tool that a lot of the world has not, yet you wield it with such carelessness. Why?
Most likely indifference, which is frankly more frustrating and stupid than, well, stupidity. Why have we devolved into not caring about our language? Do we not realize that it’s an extension of ourselves? When you write on someone’s wall, “Hey I think your really cute,” you don’t look charming, you look foolish. You wouldn’t greet a date with chocolate sauce on your face and bits of broccoli stuck in between your teeth, right? Do you see where I’m going here? (And why are you eating chocolate and broccoli at the same time?)
We’ve become so carelessly conversational now that I’m worried we’re already in too deep. I’m not saying everyone needs to memorize their grammar manual, in fact I’d be worried for you if you did, for entirely different reasons. But what I am saying is that when we stop caring about the most basic and fundamental way humans interact with each other, what have we become? Are we happy with that?
Your answer may very well be yes. It may very well be, “Hey, WLA, chill the F out. We’ve got bigger problems than this.” And this is true, the fabric of the world will not be unwoven by misplaced apostrophes. But think of it this way: at least it’s something we can control. Wars, nuclear proliferation, species extinction, economic depression, those are all problems that individually we can do very little about. So why not take ownership of your own mind, and at least re-read that last sentence you wrote?
Also, when did correcting people become so uncool? If I walked out of the house with a stain on my shirt, I’d expect you to tell me about it. I wouldn’t argue that I was being rebellious or carefree, I’d go back in and change my shirt. I wouldn’t think less of you for it, I’d think more. I’d be grateful. But correct a friend when they write, “Hey I think you left you’re purse at my apartment” at your own risk. I just don’t get it.
Unfortunately, majority often rules, and I seem to be in the minority. But I’m okay with that, really. Because I know I’m right, and I’ll take being right over being wrong any day of the week. Well, with the exception of weekend evenings…because even the WLA’s not an idiot.

WLA says: TOUCH-TONE, hands down. Nothing infuriates me more than getting in circular argument with the phone robot on the other end, which usually goes like this:
“Unnamed Credit Card Company Phone Robot: Great news! You can now speak your commands instead of touching the phone keypad.
WLA: Great.
UCCCPR: I’m sorry, I didn’t get that.
WLA: Didn’t get what?
UCCCPR: Did you say, ‘Account Balance’?
WLA: No.
UCCCPR: I’m sorry, I didn’t get that. Did you say, ‘Account Balance’?
WLA: No!
UCCCPR: Please hold while I transfer you to an account balance representative.
WLA: ::rage face:: NOOO!”
Why do companies think these systems are a good idea? They’re slower, less efficient, and frankly, they have to be more expensive, considering the voice processing going on.
Are there people out there who actually like them more than the traditional “Touch one for sales, two for…”? And if so, for the love of God, why?

WLA says: two-ply. Because what the hell is the use of one-ply when you’re just going to double it up anyway?
Unless you’re one of those people who takes waaaay more than they need. And let’s be honest – we’ve all done it. So maybe there’s a savings.
But nah, two-ply still wins. The risks are just too high otherwise.

Add another item to the list of things Sarah Palin probably hates (but her daughter should have wished she could have used): Ella, the new birth control option just approved for use in the US.
Though the drug is hardly new (it’s been available in at least 22 countries, including those in the CONTINENT of Europe, for over a year), US officials have taken their sweet old time in funneling it through the regulatory tubes, as it were. Taken up to 5 days after intercourse, it can prevent pregnancy.
SOUND THE ALARM!!! PREDATORY MALES EVERYWHERE ARE JUMPING FOR JOY OVER ABORTION ROOFIES!!!
Or so the old-guard conservatives will have you believe. Oh, and also, according to the Concerned Women for America, because of this “…girls won’t be tested for sexually transmitted diseases. When a woman experiences complications, the prescribing ‘doctor’ will be as anonymous as a drug dealer in a back alley.” (from: The Washington Post)
YAAWWWNN. We have heard this inane and indefensible rumor so many times it’s no longer even maddening anymore, it’s just BORING. Why do we continue to have to have this argument? Or the better question: why do we even bother giving argumentative credence to it at all?
It’s sort of like trying to argue with a chicken that’s had its head cut off, but it still running around spurting blood everywhere. Only this chicken doesn’t ever die.
There is a perfectly rational and honest discussion to be had about terminating or preventing a pregnancy, and the morals, reasons, and philosophies behind those choices. However, the CWA and similar groups never seem interested in having it. Stuck forever in the past, they’re fighting trench warfare, where you just keep digging and digging, distancing yourself further and further from any meaningful confrontation. Unable to even see the other side, you just lob grenades and mortars willy-nilly, wasting time, energy, and accomplishing hellishly little.
If you’re actually concerned (that’s you, CWA) for women’s health and well-being, you don’t try to scare them into submission with images of baby-hunting man-monsters. Instead, you talk to them, help them feel comfortable with themselves and their decisions to use birth control, or not to. You want women to listen to you? Try listening to them first.
But what do I know? I’m just the WLA…
~quotes and some information courtesy of Rob Stein’s blog about the topic today.



